Compensation within the federal government’s Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is structured according to established pay scales and is subject to periodic adjustments. Projected earnings for federal employees in a specific year, such as the one mentioned, are determined by factors including grade level (GS), step within that grade, and locality pay adjustments based on the cost of living in different geographic areas. The General Schedule (GS) is the predominant pay scale for white-collar federal employees, and annual increases are often proposed based on economic indicators and legislative decisions.
Understanding projected federal pay is essential for current and prospective government employees. Accurate estimates facilitate financial planning, inform career advancement decisions, and contribute to a broader understanding of the economic conditions influencing public sector compensation. Historical trends in federal pay adjustments offer context for anticipating future changes and evaluating the competitiveness of government salaries compared to the private sector. This awareness can contribute to attracting and retaining a skilled federal workforce.
Subsequent discussion will delve into the specific factors that influence federal compensation, examine available resources for determining projected salary levels, and outline the process by which federal pay adjustments are determined and implemented.
1. Projected Pay Scales
Projected pay scales serve as the foundational framework for estimating federal government compensation in a given year, such as the year in question. These scales, typically released annually by the Office of Personnel Management, outline base salaries for each General Schedule (GS) grade and step. The anticipation and analysis of these projected scales are paramount in understanding potential earnings for federal employees. For instance, the projected scale will indicate the base salary for a GS-9, Step 3 employee, before locality adjustments are applied. Therefore, understanding how the projected pay scale is formulated directly influences estimations of compensation for that year. The projected scale is influenced by economic forecasts, proposed budget allocations, and legislative considerations related to federal employee compensation, serving as the starting point for estimating individual federal employees’ earnings.
The practical significance of understanding projected pay scales extends beyond individual financial planning. Government agencies use these scales for budgeting and human resource planning. Accurate projection of salary expenditures enables informed decision-making related to staffing levels, recruitment strategies, and overall agency financial stability. Moreover, labor unions representing federal employees utilize projected pay scales to advocate for fair and competitive compensation packages during negotiations. The availability of credible projected pay scale data allows stakeholders to engage in data-driven discussions and contributes to equitable outcomes. For example, comparing projected scales with inflation rates provides insights into the real value of federal salaries and informs strategies to maintain competitive compensation.
In conclusion, projected pay scales are a critical component of understanding potential compensation in a given year. The understanding of these scales allows employees to perform accurate financial planning. The accuracy of these pay scales impact government budgets, informing negotiations on pay and benefits packages.
2. Grade Level Impact
Grade level, as defined by the General Schedule (GS) within the Office of Personnel Management, directly dictates the base salary range for federal employees. The higher the grade level, the greater the corresponding base compensation. Consequently, the grade level is a primary determinant when projecting potential earnings. For example, an individual holding a GS-13 position will inherently have a higher base salary, even at the lowest step, than an individual holding a GS-7 position at the highest step. The projected salary will thus be fundamentally shaped by the assigned grade, underscoring its direct impact on the potential earnings within the OPM framework. The grade is assigned based on the responsibilities, education, and experience requirements of the position.
The impact of grade level extends beyond the initial base salary determination. Eligibility for certain benefits, training opportunities, and career advancement pathways are often tied to the employee’s grade level. For instance, positions requiring specialized expertise or supervisory responsibilities typically necessitate higher grade levels, reflecting the increased complexity and demands of the role. Furthermore, eligibility for promotions is contingent upon meeting specific criteria related to performance and qualifications, often within the context of the existing grade. Understanding the requirements and progression pathways associated with different grade levels is crucial for employees seeking to advance their careers and maximize their earning potential within the federal government. This is because the grade level also plays a key role in determining the employee’s eligibility for merit-based increases.
In summary, grade level serves as a foundational element in the compensation structure. It is both a starting point for determining base salary and a factor influencing opportunities for career growth and enhanced benefits. A clear understanding of how grade levels are assigned and the potential for advancement within the GS system is essential for both current and prospective federal employees aiming to navigate the federal compensation landscape effectively. Without consideration of the grade level, there cannot be an accurate projection of federal employee compensation.
3. Step Increases
Step increases are incremental advancements within each grade level of the General Schedule (GS) pay system, directly influencing projected federal compensation, specifically estimations pertaining to salary in future years such as the one referenced. These step increases represent regular advancements in pay for employees who demonstrate satisfactory performance and meet established eligibility criteria. Understanding the mechanics of step increases is crucial for accurately projecting federal employee compensation.
-
Eligibility and Frequency
Eligibility for step increases is typically contingent upon satisfactory performance and continuous service within the federal government. Employees generally progress through the initial steps (Steps 1-4) at one-year intervals, Steps 5-7 at two-year intervals, and Steps 8-10 at three-year intervals. These intervals can be affected by performance ratings and certain personnel actions. This progression directly impacts projections, as an employee’s current step and performance history determine their future step increases. For instance, an employee at Step 4 with a satisfactory rating can expect to advance to Step 5 in one year, impacting projected compensation.
-
Impact on Salary Progression
Step increases provide a structured framework for salary growth within each GS grade. Each step represents a specific percentage increase over the previous step, leading to predictable advancements in compensation. This structured progression allows employees to anticipate their potential earnings over time, provided they maintain satisfactory performance. The magnitude of these increases varies depending on the GS grade, with higher grades generally experiencing larger absolute dollar increases per step. Accurately accounting for these step increases is essential when projecting federal employee compensation over multiple years.
-
Relationship to Performance and Conduct
While step increases are generally awarded based on continuous service, sustained unsatisfactory performance or instances of misconduct can delay or prevent an employee from receiving a scheduled step increase. Agencies have the authority to withhold step increases based on performance evaluations, ensuring that compensation reflects the employee’s contributions and adherence to standards. This conditional aspect of step increases introduces a degree of variability into projections, necessitating consideration of individual performance histories when estimating future earnings. The potential for withheld step increases underscores the link between performance and compensation progression within the federal government.
-
Interaction with Locality Pay
Step increases are applied to the base salary determined by the GS grade and step, prior to the application of locality pay adjustments. Locality pay, which accounts for cost-of-living differences across geographic areas, is calculated as a percentage of the adjusted base salary (base salary plus step increase). This interaction means that step increases indirectly influence the magnitude of locality pay adjustments, amplifying their overall impact on total compensation. For employees in high-cost areas, the combined effect of step increases and locality pay can result in significant increases in overall compensation. Therefore, projecting accurate compensation requires considering both step increases and the applicable locality pay rates.
The predictable and incremental nature of step increases, coupled with their dependence on performance and interaction with locality pay, makes them a critical factor when projecting federal compensation within the OPM framework. While economic conditions and legislative changes can influence broader pay adjustments, step increases provide a structured mechanism for individual employees to progress in compensation, provided they meet established criteria. Accurate estimations must account for these increases to give an overall picture of federal compensation.
4. Locality Adjustments
Locality adjustments are a critical component in determining federal employee compensation, including projected earnings for a specific future year. These adjustments are designed to address variations in the cost of living across different geographic areas, ensuring that federal employees receive equitable compensation relative to local economic conditions. Their application directly impacts the figures associated with federal salaries.
-
Purpose and Calculation
The primary purpose of locality pay is to mitigate the impact of cost-of-living disparities on federal employees’ purchasing power. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) conducts regular surveys and analyses of consumer prices, housing costs, and other economic indicators in various metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas. These data are then used to calculate locality pay percentages, which are added to the base General Schedule (GS) salary. For example, employees working in high-cost areas like San Francisco or New York City receive significantly higher locality pay percentages than those working in areas with lower living costs. This ensures that federal employees in high-cost areas can maintain a comparable standard of living to their counterparts in less expensive regions. The calculation methodology and data sources are subject to periodic review and refinement.
-
Geographic Boundaries and Metropolitan Statistical Areas
Locality pay areas are typically defined by Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) or Combined Statistical Areas (CSAs), as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. These areas represent integrated economic regions with significant levels of commuting and economic activity. The boundaries of these areas can expand or contract based on demographic and economic changes, leading to adjustments in locality pay assignments for federal employees. In some cases, entire states or portions of states may be designated as locality pay areas. These geographic delineations are subject to periodic review and revision based on updated economic data, impacting employees in the affected regions.
-
Impact on Recruitment and Retention
Locality adjustments play a crucial role in attracting and retaining qualified federal employees, particularly in high-cost areas. Without adequate locality pay, it would be difficult for the federal government to compete with private-sector employers in these regions, potentially leading to staffing shortages and a decline in the quality of public service. Competitive locality pay helps ensure that federal agencies can recruit and retain skilled professionals, contributing to effective government operations. The effectiveness of locality pay in achieving these goals is continuously evaluated by OPM and other stakeholders.
-
Interaction with Base Pay and Other Benefits
Locality pay is calculated as a percentage of an employee’s base GS salary, prior to the application of other benefits or deductions. This means that locality pay directly increases an employee’s gross income, which subsequently affects deductions for taxes, retirement contributions, and other benefits. For example, a higher locality pay adjustment will result in a larger contribution to the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), the federal government’s retirement savings program. Understanding the interaction between locality pay and other components of compensation is essential for accurate financial planning. The interplay between base pay, locality pay, and benefits can influence federal compensation.
In summation, locality adjustments are not merely add-ons to base pay; they are integral to ensuring fair and competitive compensation for federal employees across diverse geographic areas. They are carefully calibrated using cost-of-living data and impact recruitment, retention, and financial well-being. Therefore, accurate projections of federal salary depend on a thorough understanding of the principles and dynamics of locality pay. Without these considerations, any discussion of federal earnings would be incomplete.
5. Legislative Changes
Legislative changes represent a significant variable in projecting federal employee compensation for any future year. Congressional actions concerning appropriations, pay freezes, or alterations to the General Schedule directly influence the salary landscape for the Office of Personnel Management and its workforce. Understanding these potential legislative impacts is crucial for accurate salary forecasting.
-
Annual Appropriations Process
The annual appropriations process, through which Congress allocates funding for federal agencies, directly affects the resources available for employee compensation. Legislative decisions regarding overall federal spending and specific allocations for OPM determine the feasibility of proposed pay increases or other compensation adjustments. For instance, a constrained appropriations environment could result in a decision to freeze federal pay or limit the scope of locality pay adjustments. These decisions have a direct and measurable impact on projected salary figures.
-
Pay Freezes and Adjustments
Congress possesses the authority to impose pay freezes or mandate specific pay adjustments for federal employees. These actions can supersede scheduled step increases or locality pay adjustments, thereby significantly altering the projected salary trajectories for federal workers. Historically, pay freezes have been implemented during periods of economic austerity or fiscal constraint. Conversely, Congress may authorize targeted pay increases to address recruitment challenges or to maintain competitiveness with the private sector. Such actions directly influence the potential compensation.
-
Changes to the General Schedule (GS)
Legislative changes can also impact the structure and operation of the General Schedule (GS) pay system itself. Congress may enact legislation to modify the grade levels, step increases, or qualification requirements associated with different federal positions. These changes can have far-reaching consequences for federal employees, affecting their promotion opportunities, career paths, and overall earning potential. Substantive changes to GS are rare but can be enacted by legislature at any time.
-
Impact of Economic Stimulus Packages
In response to economic downturns or national emergencies, Congress may enact economic stimulus packages that include provisions affecting federal employee compensation. These packages could include temporary pay bonuses, enhanced benefits, or other incentives designed to support the federal workforce and stimulate economic activity. Such measures can provide a short-term boost to federal employee compensation, but their long-term sustainability depends on subsequent legislative actions and economic conditions.
In summary, legislative changes are a pivotal factor in shaping federal employee compensation, including salary projections for a specific year. Congressional actions concerning appropriations, pay adjustments, and modifications to the General Schedule can significantly alter the salary landscape for OPM employees. Accurate salary projections must account for the potential impact of these legislative changes and their resulting cascading effects.
6. Economic Indicators
Economic indicators exert a significant influence on projected federal employee compensation, specifically within the context of salaries determined by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Inflation rates, unemployment figures, and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth are key metrics considered when formulating federal pay adjustments. A rising inflation rate, for example, often precipitates calls for increased federal compensation to maintain employees’ purchasing power. Similarly, robust GDP growth may bolster arguments for higher federal salaries, reflecting a generally healthier economic environment. The interplay between these indicators and federal pay decisions is complex, involving political considerations and budgetary constraints; however, the underlying economic data serves as a crucial input in the decision-making process. Failure to adequately account for these indicators can result in federal salaries that are uncompetitive with the private sector or that fail to keep pace with the rising cost of living.
The practical application of economic indicators in federal pay determinations is evident in the annual adjustments to locality pay. OPM utilizes data on local cost-of-living variations, derived from economic indicators, to tailor salary adjustments for federal employees stationed in different geographic areas. For instance, areas with higher housing costs and overall living expenses receive greater locality pay adjustments, reflecting the need to compensate federal employees adequately within those regions. Moreover, collective bargaining agreements between federal employee unions and government agencies frequently incorporate economic indicators as benchmarks for negotiating salary increases and benefit enhancements. These indicators provide objective data points that inform discussions and contribute to establishing fair and equitable compensation packages. A recession could lead to budget cuts, limiting or freezing federal pay adjustments.
In conclusion, economic indicators are indispensable to the process of projecting and establishing fair federal salaries. Their accurate assessment and integration into compensation decisions are vital for attracting and retaining a qualified federal workforce and ensuring the economic well-being of government employees. While external factors and legislative actions inevitably play a role, economic indicators provide an essential foundation for evidence-based compensation policies within the federal government. Ignoring economic data would be unwise and has negative long term effects.
7. Federal Budgets
The federal budget cycle constitutes a foundational determinant of projected federal employee compensation, including prospective salaries within the Office of Personnel Management. Congressional appropriations directly dictate the financial resources available for federal agencies, and the allocation of these resources inherently influences the funding available for personnel costs. Consequently, the decisions made during the federal budget process have a direct and cascading effect on the potential salary scales for federal employees in any given year. For example, should a budget resolution impose significant constraints on overall federal spending, agencies may be forced to implement hiring freezes, limit pay increases, or reduce existing staff levels, directly impacting the projected salaries of federal employees. Conversely, a budget that prioritizes investments in the federal workforce could lead to enhanced compensation packages and increased salary scales. Thus, understanding the intricacies of the federal budget cycle is essential for any attempt to accurately project federal employee salaries.
The practical significance of this connection extends beyond mere theoretical understanding. Federal employee unions, for instance, utilize insights into the federal budget process to advocate for fair and competitive compensation packages during negotiations with government agencies. By closely monitoring budget proposals and lobbying for increased funding for federal personnel, unions can exert influence on the salary scales ultimately approved by Congress. Similarly, individual federal employees can benefit from understanding the budget process by actively engaging with their elected officials and advocating for policies that support a well-compensated federal workforce. Moreover, prospective federal employees can leverage this knowledge to make informed career decisions, weighing the potential salary and job security implications of different budget scenarios. For instance, a prospective employee may choose to pursue a career in an agency with a relatively stable budget outlook, rather than one facing potential budget cuts.
In conclusion, the federal budget process is inextricably linked to the projection of federal employee salaries, including salaries within the Office of Personnel Management. Congressional appropriations decisions directly influence the financial resources available for federal personnel costs, thereby shaping potential salary scales. Understanding this connection is crucial for federal employee unions, individual employees, and prospective employees seeking to navigate the complex landscape of federal compensation. Any attempt to project federal employee salaries must incorporate a thorough assessment of the current and projected federal budget environment, including potential legislative changes and spending priorities.
8. Cost of Living
Cost of living is a primary determinant in the establishment of equitable federal employee compensation, specifically influencing projected salary figures. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) utilizes cost-of-living data to implement locality pay adjustments, designed to mitigate the impact of geographic variations in expenses on federal employees’ purchasing power. Without these adjustments, federal salaries would be standardized nationally, creating significant financial burdens for employees stationed in high-cost areas. The projection of federal salaries, as exemplified by a specific future year, necessitates a thorough consideration of prevailing cost-of-living conditions across different metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas. For instance, employees located in urban centers with high housing costs and property taxes will receive higher locality pay percentages than those stationed in regions with lower living expenses, to maintain a comparable standard of living. This direct correlation between cost of living and federal salary levels underscores the practical significance of understanding these economic factors.
The calculation of locality pay, directly impacting projected federal compensation, involves the analysis of consumer price data, housing market trends, transportation costs, and other relevant economic indicators. OPM conducts regular surveys and analyses to ascertain the relative cost of living in different geographic regions, and these data are then utilized to formulate locality pay adjustments. This data-driven approach aims to ensure that federal salaries reflect the economic realities faced by employees in their respective locations. For example, if housing costs in a particular metropolitan area experience a significant increase, OPM may revise the locality pay percentage for that area, resulting in a corresponding adjustment to federal employee salaries. These adjustments not only impact current salaries but also inform projections of future earnings, as cost-of-living trends are factored into estimations of salary growth.
In conclusion, cost of living constitutes a critical component of projected federal employee salaries, influencing locality pay adjustments and shaping overall compensation packages. The accurate assessment and integration of cost-of-living data into federal pay determinations are essential for attracting and retaining a qualified workforce and ensuring the economic well-being of government employees. However, challenges remain in accurately measuring cost-of-living variations and ensuring that locality pay adjustments keep pace with rapidly changing economic conditions. Nevertheless, the fundamental connection between cost of living and federal salary levels remains a cornerstone of federal compensation policy, influencing both current earnings and projections of future compensation.
9. Years of Service
Years of service within the federal government, particularly in the context of Office of Personnel Management (OPM) compensation, represents a key factor influencing projected salary for future years, such as the one referenced. The length of federal employment contributes to salary progression through established mechanisms, directly affecting the financial outlook for federal employees.
-
Step Increases Progression
Years of service directly correlate with eligibility for step increases within the General Schedule (GS) pay system. Employees typically advance through the initial steps at one-year intervals, with subsequent steps requiring longer periods of service. Therefore, longer tenure directly translates into higher placement on the GS scale, resulting in increased base pay. For example, an employee with ten years of service is likely to be at a higher step than an employee with only two years, assuming similar performance ratings. This progression impacts projected compensation, as years of service are a primary determinant of future step increases.
-
Retirement Benefits Accrual
Years of service are a critical factor in determining retirement benefits under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) or the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Longer periods of service generally lead to higher annuity payments upon retirement. This relationship indirectly affects current salary considerations, as the anticipation of a more substantial retirement income may influence an employee’s willingness to accept certain salary levels or pursue specific career paths. The calculation of retirement benefits incorporates years of service as a primary variable, directly impacting the long-term financial security of federal employees.
-
Seniority and Promotion Opportunities
While not the sole determinant, years of service can contribute to an employee’s seniority within a federal agency. Seniority may influence promotion opportunities, particularly in competitive environments. Employees with longer tenure may be viewed as having greater institutional knowledge and experience, potentially giving them an advantage in promotion selections. Promotions generally lead to higher grade levels and corresponding salary increases, further impacting the projected compensation trajectory. This influence is indirect, as performance, qualifications, and other factors also play a significant role in promotion decisions.
-
Leave Accrual Rates
The rate at which federal employees accrue annual leave is directly tied to their years of service. Employees with longer tenure accrue more annual leave per pay period, providing them with greater flexibility and time off. While this does not directly impact base salary, it represents a valuable component of the overall compensation package. The increased leave accrual rate translates to a greater opportunity for paid time off, enhancing work-life balance and contributing to overall employee satisfaction. This benefit is a direct result of accumulated years of service within the federal government.
In summation, years of service are intrinsically linked to the projection of OPM salary in a future year. They directly influence step increases, contribute to retirement benefits, can enhance promotion opportunities, and determine leave accrual rates. Understanding the interplay between years of service and these various factors is essential for accurately estimating potential compensation and assessing the long-term financial implications of a federal career.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common inquiries regarding projected federal employee compensation, focusing on the factors and processes that determine potential earnings. The information provided is intended to offer clarity and understanding of the federal pay system.
Question 1: How is the base salary determined?
Base salary is primarily determined by an employee’s General Schedule (GS) grade and step. Each grade corresponds to a defined range of responsibilities and qualifications, while steps represent incremental advancements within that grade. The Office of Personnel Management publishes annual pay scales that outline the base salary for each grade and step combination.
Question 2: What is the role of locality pay?
Locality pay adjustments are implemented to address geographic variations in the cost of living. These adjustments are applied to the base salary and vary based on the employee’s work location. Areas with higher living expenses receive higher locality pay percentages, ensuring equitable purchasing power across different regions.
Question 3: How do step increases work?
Step increases represent regular advancements in pay for employees who demonstrate satisfactory performance. The frequency of step increases varies based on the employee’s step level, with earlier steps occurring at one-year intervals and later steps occurring at two- or three-year intervals.
Question 4: Are pay freezes possible?
Yes, Congress has the authority to impose pay freezes or mandate specific pay adjustments for federal employees. These actions can supersede scheduled step increases or locality pay adjustments, thereby impacting projected salary trajectories. Pay freezes are typically implemented during periods of economic austerity or fiscal constraint.
Question 5: What economic factors influence federal compensation?
Economic indicators such as inflation rates, unemployment figures, and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth influence federal pay adjustments. A rising inflation rate often prompts consideration of increased federal compensation to maintain employees’ purchasing power.
Question 6: How does the federal budget affect projected salaries?
Congressional appropriations, determined through the annual federal budget process, directly impact the resources available for federal employee compensation. Budget decisions can affect the feasibility of proposed pay increases or other compensation adjustments.
Understanding these key factors and processes is crucial for accurately interpreting projections of federal salary. While various economic, legislative, and individual factors can influence actual earnings, these FAQs provide a solid foundation for navigating the federal compensation landscape.
Subsequent sections will delve into strategies for maximizing earning potential within the federal government and resources for staying informed about federal pay policies.
Maximizing Earning Potential
Achieving optimal compensation within the federal government requires proactive planning and a strategic approach to career development. Understanding the mechanics of the federal pay system and taking steps to enhance qualifications can significantly impact earning potential.
Tip 1: Prioritize Education and Skill Development: Investing in relevant education and skill development is crucial for career advancement. Earning advanced degrees or certifications can qualify employees for higher-grade positions with increased earning potential. For instance, obtaining a master’s degree in a specialized field may open doors to GS-12 or GS-13 positions.
Tip 2: Seek Out Opportunities for Advancement: Actively pursue opportunities for promotion within the agency. This may involve taking on additional responsibilities, participating in leadership development programs, or seeking out challenging assignments that demonstrate capabilities and leadership potential. Employees should seek opportunities to demonstrate exemplary performance and leadership skills.
Tip 3: Master the Application Process: A well-crafted resume and application are essential for securing promotions. Ensure that the application accurately reflects skills, experience, and accomplishments. Tailor the application to the specific requirements of the position and highlight relevant qualifications.
Tip 4: Understand Locality Pay Dynamics: Research and understand the dynamics of locality pay in different geographic areas. Consider the potential impact of relocation on overall compensation. Employees may find that a move to a higher locality pay area significantly increases their earning potential, even with the same GS grade and step.
Tip 5: Network and Seek Mentorship: Building a strong professional network and seeking mentorship from experienced colleagues can provide valuable insights into career advancement opportunities. Mentors can offer guidance on navigating the federal system and developing skills and experiences needed for higher-grade positions.
Tip 6: Stay Informed on Policy Changes: Remain informed about changes to federal pay policies, regulations, and benefits. Attend training sessions and workshops to enhance understanding of the federal compensation system. Proactive monitoring of policy changes ensures preparedness for potential adjustments to compensation.
By strategically prioritizing education, seeking advancement opportunities, mastering the application process, understanding locality pay, networking, and staying informed, federal employees can significantly enhance their earning potential and achieve their career goals.
The subsequent section will provide a guide to available resources for staying informed about the latest federal pay policies and regulations, ensuring that federal employees have access to the information they need to navigate the federal compensation landscape effectively.
Conclusion
This examination of projected compensation, as exemplified by “opm salary 2025”, has underscored the multifaceted nature of federal pay determination. Grade levels, step increases, locality adjustments, legislative mandates, economic indicators, budgetary constraints, cost of living, and years of service collectively influence the financial landscape for federal employees. A comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for accurate financial planning and informed career decisions within the federal government.
The future trajectory of federal compensation remains subject to dynamic economic and political forces. Continued diligence in monitoring legislative developments, economic trends, and OPM policy changes is paramount for both current and prospective federal employees. Proactive engagement and informed advocacy are essential to ensuring a fair and competitive federal compensation system that attracts and retains a skilled public workforce.
