The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) establish guidelines concerning payments made to insurance brokers who facilitate enrollment in Medicare plans. This framework, specifically related to the year 2025, outlines the allowable amounts and structures for commissions and other forms of remuneration brokers can receive for assisting beneficiaries in selecting appropriate coverage. It addresses concerns around potential conflicts of interest and aims to ensure brokers prioritize the needs of enrollees rather than simply pursuing the most lucrative plans for themselves.
Understanding the regulations surrounding agent and broker payments is crucial for maintaining transparency and integrity within the Medicare system. These guidelines can influence the choices brokers present to beneficiaries, impact the cost of Medicare plans, and affect the overall accessibility of healthcare coverage for seniors and individuals with disabilities. Historical context reveals a continuous evolution of these payment structures, often responding to industry practices and policy objectives aimed at improving beneficiary outcomes.
The following discussion will delve into specific aspects of the upcoming payment structure, the potential effects on broker behavior, and the implications for Medicare beneficiaries seeking to navigate the complexities of plan selection. Topics will include the types of compensation permissible, the reporting requirements for brokers, and the mechanisms in place to ensure compliance with CMS regulations.
1. Commission Structures
Commission structures form a fundamental element of “cms broker compensation 2025,” directly influencing how insurance brokers are financially rewarded for enrolling individuals in Medicare plans. These structures dictate the amount and method of payment, thereby shaping broker behavior and potentially impacting beneficiary plan selection.
-
Initial Enrollment Commissions
These commissions are paid to brokers for enrolling a beneficiary in a new Medicare plan. The amount is typically a fixed dollar amount, potentially varying based on the type of plan (e.g., Medicare Advantage, Medicare Supplement). Under “cms broker compensation 2025”, the specifics of these payments are strictly regulated to avoid incentivizing brokers to push certain plans over others that might be more suitable for the beneficiary’s needs. For instance, a broker may receive a higher commission for enrolling someone in a Medicare Advantage plan compared to a Medicare Supplement plan, which could inadvertently lead them to prioritize the former regardless of the individual’s healthcare requirements.
-
Renewal Commissions
Beyond the initial enrollment, brokers often receive annual renewal commissions for beneficiaries who remain enrolled in the same plan. This creates an ongoing revenue stream for the broker. Within the framework of “cms broker compensation 2025”, these renewal commissions are carefully monitored to prevent brokers from simply maintaining existing enrollments without proactively assessing whether the plan continues to meet the beneficiary’s evolving needs. The regulations may place limits on renewal commissions to disincentivize passive plan retention and encourage a focus on providing ongoing, needs-based advice.
-
Bonus and Incentive Programs
Some insurance companies offer bonus programs or incentives to brokers who achieve certain enrollment targets or sell specific types of plans. Such programs can significantly influence broker behavior. The “cms broker compensation 2025” guidelines scrutinize these incentive programs, aiming to eliminate those that create undue pressure on brokers to prioritize sales volume over beneficiary well-being. For example, if a broker receives a substantial bonus for enrolling a certain number of individuals in a specific plan with limited availability or suitability, it could compromise the integrity of the enrollment process.
-
Fee-for-Service Alternatives
An alternative to commission-based compensation is a fee-for-service model, where beneficiaries pay brokers directly for their advice and assistance. While less common, this approach can potentially mitigate conflicts of interest inherent in commission-based systems. “cms broker compensation 2025” acknowledges the potential benefits of this model, exploring avenues to promote its adoption and ensure that beneficiaries have access to transparent and unbiased guidance. However, concerns remain about the accessibility of this model, as it may pose financial barriers for some beneficiaries.
Ultimately, the commission structures established under “cms broker compensation 2025” are designed to strike a balance between fairly compensating brokers for their services and protecting beneficiaries from biased or inappropriate plan recommendations. Continuous evaluation and refinement of these structures are essential to ensure the integrity and effectiveness of the Medicare program.
2. Fair Market Value
Fair Market Value (FMV) constitutes a crucial component of “cms broker compensation 2025,” serving as a benchmark for determining reasonable and justifiable payments to insurance brokers facilitating Medicare plan enrollments. FMV, in this context, signifies the price a willing buyer (the insurance company or CMS) would pay a willing seller (the broker) for their services, absent undue influence or coercion. Establishing FMV prevents inflated or excessive compensation that could incentivize brokers to prioritize financial gain over beneficiary needs. Without a clear understanding and enforcement of FMV principles within “cms broker compensation 2025,” the system risks becoming susceptible to abuse, potentially leading to beneficiaries being steered toward plans that are not in their best interest but offer higher commissions to the brokers. For example, if a particular Medicare Advantage plan offers significantly higher broker compensation than its competitors without commensurate value to the beneficiary, the absence of FMV oversight could lead to brokers disproportionately recommending that specific plan.
The assessment of Fair Market Value involves several factors. It necessitates a detailed analysis of the services provided by the broker, including the time spent counseling beneficiaries, the complexity of the plans being presented, and the broker’s expertise. Comparisons with compensation levels for similar services in comparable markets provide essential context. Furthermore, regulatory bodies, such as CMS, may issue guidelines or benchmarks to aid in the determination of FMV. Applying these guidelines is not always straightforward, requiring careful consideration of individual circumstances and regional variations. The implementation of FMV standards aims to ensure that brokers are adequately compensated for their work, while simultaneously preventing undue influence from insurance companies seeking to manipulate the enrollment process. Independent actuarial assessments can further enhance the objectivity and reliability of FMV determinations.
In summary, the principle of Fair Market Value is inextricably linked to the integrity of “cms broker compensation 2025.” Its proper application serves as a safeguard against conflicts of interest and promotes a more equitable healthcare marketplace for Medicare beneficiaries. Challenges remain in accurately assessing and consistently enforcing FMV standards, requiring ongoing vigilance and refinement of regulatory frameworks. By prioritizing Fair Market Value, the Medicare system strives to ensure that brokers are incentivized to provide objective advice and facilitate enrollment in plans that genuinely meet the needs of those they serve.
3. Compliance Requirements
Compliance requirements are inextricably linked to the efficacy and ethical operation of “cms broker compensation 2025.” These mandates dictate the standards brokers must adhere to in order to receive payment for their services. Failure to comply can result in penalties, including the revocation of selling privileges and the forfeiture of commissions. These regulations are designed to safeguard beneficiaries from misleading or fraudulent practices and ensure brokers prioritize appropriate plan recommendations over maximizing personal financial gain. As a result, the structure of “cms broker compensation 2025” is fundamentally dependent on the rigorous enforcement of these compliance standards.
The consequences of non-compliance directly impact both brokers and beneficiaries. For example, if a broker fails to accurately disclose their compensation structure to a beneficiary, they are in violation of compliance regulations and risk losing their commission. Simultaneously, the beneficiary may unknowingly be enrolled in a plan that is not the most suitable for their needs. Furthermore, compliance encompasses adherence to marketing guidelines, prohibiting deceptive or aggressive sales tactics. Brokers are required to complete annual training and certification to demonstrate their understanding of CMS regulations and ethical responsibilities. Audits and monitoring activities are conducted to identify and address instances of non-compliance, thereby maintaining the integrity of the Medicare enrollment process. The “cms broker compensation 2025” framework establishes a structured system for oversight, ensuring that brokers are held accountable for their actions and that beneficiaries are protected from potential harm.
In conclusion, compliance requirements are not merely an ancillary component of “cms broker compensation 2025” but rather a foundational element essential for fostering a fair and transparent Medicare marketplace. They function as a deterrent against unethical behavior, safeguarding beneficiary interests and ensuring that brokers operate within a framework of accountability. The ongoing refinement and rigorous enforcement of these requirements are crucial for maintaining the effectiveness of the Medicare program and promoting informed healthcare choices for all beneficiaries. Challenges remain in ensuring universal compliance, particularly given the decentralized nature of the broker network, but continued investment in training, monitoring, and enforcement mechanisms is essential to achieving these goals.
4. Beneficiary Protection
Beneficiary protection forms a cornerstone of the regulations governing “cms broker compensation 2025.” The premise centers on ensuring that Medicare beneficiaries receive unbiased advice and are enrolled in plans that genuinely meet their individual healthcare needs, rather than being steered toward options that primarily benefit the broker financially. The framework aims to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and promote informed decision-making amongst beneficiaries, who may often lack the expertise to navigate the complexities of the Medicare system effectively.
-
Disclosure of Compensation
Transparency regarding broker compensation is crucial for beneficiary protection. Regulations mandate clear and conspicuous disclosure of how a broker is paid, including the source and amount of compensation received for enrolling a beneficiary in a specific plan. This allows beneficiaries to assess potential biases and make more informed choices, understanding that a broker’s recommendation may be influenced by financial incentives. Non-disclosure or misleading statements about compensation can result in penalties and undermine the trust between brokers and beneficiaries. For instance, a broker must explicitly state if they receive a higher commission for enrolling a beneficiary in a Medicare Advantage plan compared to a Medicare Supplement plan.
-
Suitability Standards
Suitability standards require brokers to assess a beneficiary’s individual needs and preferences before recommending a particular Medicare plan. This involves gathering information about their medical history, current medications, preferred healthcare providers, and budget constraints. Brokers are expected to recommend plans that align with these needs, even if those plans offer lower commissions. The violation of suitability standards, such as enrolling a beneficiary in a plan with limited access to their preferred specialists without proper disclosure, can result in regulatory action and restitution for the beneficiary.
-
Prohibition of Steering
Regulations prohibit brokers from “steering” beneficiaries towards specific plans based solely on financial incentives. Steering occurs when a broker actively discourages a beneficiary from considering plans that may be more suitable, simply because those plans offer lower commissions. This can manifest as providing incomplete or misleading information about alternative plan options or using high-pressure sales tactics to push a particular plan. Beneficiary protection mechanisms in “cms broker compensation 2025” aim to prevent such practices by imposing stringent oversight and penalties for brokers found to be engaging in steering activities.
-
Educational Resources and Support
Providing beneficiaries with access to independent educational resources and support is vital for empowering them to make informed decisions. CMS offers various tools and resources, such as the Medicare Plan Finder and educational materials on Medicare options. Furthermore, beneficiary advocacy organizations play a crucial role in providing unbiased guidance and assistance to beneficiaries navigating the enrollment process. These resources supplement the information provided by brokers and enable beneficiaries to verify the accuracy and completeness of the advice they receive.
These interconnected facets of beneficiary protection work in concert to ensure that “cms broker compensation 2025” promotes a fair and transparent healthcare marketplace. By mandating disclosure, establishing suitability standards, prohibiting steering, and providing access to educational resources, the regulations aim to empower beneficiaries to make informed choices that align with their individual needs, rather than being influenced by brokers’ financial incentives. Continuous monitoring and enforcement of these regulations are essential for maintaining the integrity of the Medicare program and safeguarding the well-being of its beneficiaries.
5. Incentive Alignment
Incentive alignment, within the framework of “cms broker compensation 2025,” refers to structuring broker payments in a manner that encourages them to prioritize the best interests of Medicare beneficiaries, rather than solely pursuing plans that yield the highest commissions. The success of “cms broker compensation 2025” hinges on effectively aligning broker incentives with beneficiary needs, fostering a system where brokers are rewarded for providing sound, unbiased advice. A misalignment of incentives can lead to detrimental outcomes, where beneficiaries are steered toward unsuitable plans, potentially resulting in higher out-of-pocket costs, limited access to preferred providers, or inadequate coverage for their specific medical conditions. For example, if brokers receive significantly higher commissions for enrolling beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage plans with narrow networks, they might be inclined to promote these plans even when Medicare Supplement plans offer broader coverage and greater choice of providers, which might be more appropriate for some beneficiaries.
The mechanisms for achieving incentive alignment within “cms broker compensation 2025” are multifaceted. One approach involves standardizing commission rates across different types of Medicare plans, reducing the financial incentive to favor one plan over another. Another strategy focuses on rewarding brokers for achieving high beneficiary satisfaction scores or demonstrating a commitment to providing comprehensive needs assessments. The implementation of quality-based bonus programs, where brokers are rewarded for ensuring that beneficiaries receive appropriate care and achieve positive health outcomes, is also gaining traction. Furthermore, transparency in broker compensation is essential for fostering accountability. Beneficiaries should have clear access to information about how their broker is compensated, allowing them to assess potential biases and make more informed decisions. The effectiveness of these incentive alignment strategies is contingent upon rigorous monitoring and enforcement by CMS, ensuring that brokers are held accountable for their actions and that beneficiaries are protected from undue influence.
In summary, incentive alignment is a critical determinant of the overall effectiveness of “cms broker compensation 2025.” By structuring broker payments in a manner that prioritizes beneficiary needs, the Medicare system can promote informed decision-making, improve health outcomes, and ensure that beneficiaries receive the coverage that best suits their individual circumstances. Challenges remain in effectively measuring and rewarding quality of care, but ongoing efforts to refine incentive structures and enhance transparency are essential for creating a more equitable and beneficiary-centered Medicare marketplace. The practical significance of understanding incentive alignment lies in its direct impact on the accessibility and affordability of healthcare coverage for millions of Medicare beneficiaries.
6. Disclosure Obligations
Disclosure obligations constitute a central pillar in the regulatory framework surrounding “cms broker compensation 2025,” serving to enhance transparency and accountability within the Medicare enrollment process. These requirements mandate that brokers provide beneficiaries with clear and comprehensive information regarding their compensation structure, potential conflicts of interest, and the scope of services they offer. The intention is to empower beneficiaries to make informed decisions, mitigating the risk of biased or unsuitable plan recommendations.
-
Source and Amount of Compensation
Brokers must disclose the source of their compensation (e.g., insurance company commissions) and the specific amounts they receive for enrolling a beneficiary in a particular Medicare plan. This transparency allows beneficiaries to assess potential biases in the broker’s recommendations. For example, a broker must inform a beneficiary if they receive a higher commission for enrolling them in a Medicare Advantage plan compared to a Medicare Supplement plan. This disclosure enables the beneficiary to weigh the broker’s advice in light of the financial incentives involved.
-
Scope of Services Provided
Disclosure obligations extend to clarifying the range of Medicare plans a broker represents. Brokers must inform beneficiaries if they are contracted with a limited number of insurance companies or if they are independent and can offer plans from multiple carriers. This allows beneficiaries to understand the breadth of options considered by the broker and to determine if they need to seek additional advice from other sources. A broker who only represents a single insurance company must explicitly state this limitation to the beneficiary.
-
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Brokers are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence their recommendations. This includes any financial relationships or incentives beyond standard commissions that might bias their advice. For instance, a broker who receives bonuses for enrolling a certain number of beneficiaries in a specific plan must disclose this arrangement to potential enrollees. Failure to disclose such conflicts of interest undermines the integrity of the enrollment process and compromises the beneficiary’s ability to make informed choices.
-
Documentation and Record Keeping
Brokers must maintain accurate records of all disclosures made to beneficiaries, including the date, method, and content of the disclosure. These records serve as evidence of compliance with regulatory requirements and can be used in the event of a dispute or audit. Proper documentation ensures accountability and facilitates oversight of broker activities. The “cms broker compensation 2025” framework places a significant emphasis on the maintenance and availability of these records for review by regulatory authorities.
These interconnected disclosure obligations are fundamental to ensuring the effective implementation of “cms broker compensation 2025.” By promoting transparency and accountability, these regulations empower beneficiaries to navigate the complexities of the Medicare system with greater confidence and to make informed decisions that align with their individual healthcare needs. The ongoing monitoring and enforcement of these disclosure requirements are essential for maintaining the integrity of the Medicare program and safeguarding the interests of its beneficiaries. The success of the system relies on consistent and accurate disclosure practices by all participating brokers.
7. Regulatory Oversight
Regulatory oversight is paramount to the effective implementation and integrity of “cms broker compensation 2025.” It encompasses the actions taken by governmental bodies, primarily the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to monitor and enforce compliance with established rules and guidelines regarding how insurance brokers are compensated for enrolling individuals in Medicare plans. This oversight is crucial for preventing abuse, ensuring transparency, and protecting the interests of Medicare beneficiaries.
-
Auditing and Monitoring Activities
CMS conducts regular audits of broker activities and compensation arrangements to identify instances of non-compliance with “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations. These audits may involve reviewing broker records, analyzing enrollment data, and investigating beneficiary complaints. For instance, an audit might uncover a pattern of brokers disproportionately enrolling beneficiaries in specific Medicare Advantage plans that offer higher commissions, raising concerns about potential steering. Such findings can lead to corrective actions, including financial penalties and the revocation of selling privileges.
-
Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties
CMS possesses various enforcement mechanisms to address violations of “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations. These include issuing warning letters, imposing financial penalties, and suspending or revoking a broker’s ability to sell Medicare plans. A broker who fails to disclose their compensation structure to beneficiaries or engages in deceptive marketing practices may face significant fines or even lose their license. The severity of the penalty typically depends on the nature and extent of the violation, as well as the broker’s history of compliance.
-
Complaint Investigation and Resolution
CMS provides avenues for beneficiaries to file complaints against brokers who they believe have violated “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations. These complaints are thoroughly investigated, and CMS takes appropriate action to resolve the issue and protect the beneficiary’s interests. For example, if a beneficiary alleges that a broker steered them towards a plan that did not meet their needs, CMS will investigate the claim and may require the broker to make restitution to the beneficiary or face disciplinary action. The availability of a robust complaint process is essential for ensuring accountability and deterring unethical behavior.
-
Rulemaking and Guidance Updates
Regulatory oversight also involves the ongoing process of rulemaking and updating guidance to address emerging issues and refine the regulatory framework surrounding “cms broker compensation 2025.” CMS regularly issues new regulations, policy memos, and educational materials to clarify existing requirements, address loopholes, and adapt to changes in the Medicare market. These updates ensure that the regulatory framework remains relevant and effective in protecting beneficiaries and promoting fair competition among brokers. For instance, CMS may issue new guidance on the permissibility of certain types of broker incentives or the requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest.
The multi-faceted nature of regulatory oversight is critical for upholding the principles of “cms broker compensation 2025.” Through rigorous auditing, enforcement, complaint resolution, and ongoing rulemaking, CMS aims to create a fair and transparent Medicare marketplace where beneficiaries can confidently rely on brokers to provide unbiased advice and facilitate enrollment in plans that meet their individual needs. Continuous vigilance and adaptation are essential to ensure the effectiveness of these oversight mechanisms in the face of evolving challenges and emerging trends within the Medicare industry.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Broker Compensation in 2025
This section addresses common inquiries concerning the guidelines and regulations surrounding payments to insurance brokers involved in Medicare plan enrollments for the year 2025. The information provided aims to clarify key aspects of the compensation structure and its implications for beneficiaries.
Question 1: What is the primary objective of the “cms broker compensation 2025” framework?
The overarching objective is to establish a transparent and equitable system for compensating insurance brokers who assist individuals in enrolling in Medicare plans. This framework seeks to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and ensure that brokers prioritize the needs of beneficiaries, rather than solely pursuing plans that offer higher commissions.
Question 2: How does “cms broker compensation 2025” address potential conflicts of interest among brokers?
The regulations mandate full disclosure of compensation arrangements, including the source and amount of payment received by brokers for enrolling beneficiaries in specific plans. This transparency enables beneficiaries to assess potential biases and make more informed choices. Furthermore, the framework discourages incentive structures that might unduly influence brokers to favor certain plans over others.
Question 3: What types of compensation are permissible under “cms broker compensation 2025”?
Allowable compensation typically includes commissions for initial enrollments and renewals. However, the amounts and structures of these commissions are subject to CMS regulations, and must adhere to Fair Market Value standards. Certain bonus or incentive programs that create undue pressure on brokers to prioritize sales volume over beneficiary well-being may be restricted.
Question 4: What are the consequences for brokers who fail to comply with the “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations?
Non-compliance can result in a range of penalties, including warning letters, financial fines, suspension or revocation of selling privileges, and forfeiture of commissions. The severity of the penalty depends on the nature and extent of the violation, as well as the broker’s history of compliance.
Question 5: How does “cms broker compensation 2025” protect Medicare beneficiaries from potentially misleading advice?
The framework incorporates several safeguards, including suitability standards that require brokers to assess a beneficiary’s individual needs before recommending a plan, prohibitions against steering beneficiaries towards specific plans based solely on financial incentives, and requirements for brokers to provide access to educational resources and support.
Question 6: How can beneficiaries report concerns about broker conduct or potential violations of “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations?
Beneficiaries have the right to file complaints with CMS regarding broker conduct that they believe violates established regulations. CMS investigates these complaints and takes appropriate action to resolve the issue and protect the beneficiary’s interests.
In summary, the “cms broker compensation 2025” framework aims to establish a fair and transparent marketplace where brokers are adequately compensated for their services while prioritizing the best interests of Medicare beneficiaries. Vigilant oversight and enforcement of these regulations are essential for ensuring the integrity of the Medicare program.
The following section will explore resources available for beneficiaries seeking to understand their Medicare options and navigate the enrollment process effectively.
Navigating Medicare Enrollment
This section offers essential guidance for Medicare beneficiaries and those approaching eligibility, emphasizing considerations relevant to broker compensation regulations effective in 2025. Understanding these points can facilitate informed decision-making during the enrollment process.
Tip 1: Inquire About Broker Compensation. Beneficiaries should directly ask brokers about their compensation structure. Specifically, the source of their income (e.g., commission from insurance companies) and the method of payment (e.g., fixed amount per enrollment, percentage of premium) should be clearly articulated. Transparency in this area is essential for evaluating potential biases.
Tip 2: Verify Broker Credentials and Compliance. Confirm that the broker is properly licensed and certified to sell Medicare plans in the relevant state. Inquire about their understanding of “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations and their commitment to adhering to these guidelines. Evidence of ongoing training and certification is a positive indicator.
Tip 3: Understand the Scope of Plan Offerings. Determine whether the broker represents a limited number of insurance companies or operates independently, offering a wider range of plans. A broker tied to a single carrier may be less likely to present a comprehensive overview of available options. Beneficiaries should assess whether the broker’s offerings align with their needs.
Tip 4: Prioritize Needs Assessment. A responsible broker should conduct a thorough assessment of the beneficiary’s individual healthcare needs, including medical history, current medications, preferred providers, and budget constraints. The broker’s recommendations should be demonstrably aligned with these specific requirements, not solely focused on plans yielding higher commissions.
Tip 5: Scrutinize Plan Comparisons. Demand clear and unbiased comparisons of different Medicare plans, highlighting both the benefits and limitations of each option. The broker should explain the differences in coverage, cost-sharing, network restrictions, and other relevant factors. Avoid brokers who pressure beneficiaries to enroll in a particular plan without adequately explaining alternatives.
Tip 6: Document Interactions and Agreements. Maintain records of all communications with brokers, including the dates, topics discussed, and any agreements made. This documentation can be valuable in the event of a dispute or if concerns arise about broker conduct. A written summary of plan recommendations is advisable.
Tip 7: Seek Independent Verification. Supplement the information provided by brokers with independent research and consultation with trusted sources, such as the Medicare website, beneficiary advocacy organizations, or family members. Verifying the accuracy and completeness of the broker’s advice is crucial for informed decision-making.
Tip 8: Report Suspicious Activity. Beneficiaries who suspect that a broker has violated “cms broker compensation 2025” regulations should report their concerns to CMS or the appropriate state regulatory agency. Timely reporting can help protect other beneficiaries from similar harm and ensure that brokers are held accountable for their actions.
In summary, understanding broker compensation regulations and actively engaging in the enrollment process are essential steps for Medicare beneficiaries. By following these guidelines, beneficiaries can mitigate the risk of biased advice and ensure that they are enrolled in plans that genuinely meet their healthcare needs.
The concluding section will summarize the key takeaways from this article and offer resources for further exploration of the “cms broker compensation 2025” landscape.
Conclusion
This exploration of “cms broker compensation 2025” has illuminated the critical aspects of regulating payments to insurance brokers involved in Medicare plan enrollments. Key points include the emphasis on Fair Market Value, rigorous compliance requirements, and the paramount importance of beneficiary protection through transparent disclosure and suitability standards. The alignment of broker incentives with beneficiary needs, coupled with robust regulatory oversight, serves as the foundation for a fair and equitable Medicare marketplace.
The effectiveness of these regulations hinges on continuous vigilance and proactive engagement from all stakeholders. Further investigation into specific plan offerings, broker qualifications, and evolving regulatory guidance is strongly encouraged to ensure informed decision-making and protect the integrity of the Medicare system for current and future beneficiaries.
